Permitless Murders
In August of 2022, half of the states in America will (or did, depending on when you read this) switch to “permitless carry,” which means residents (and, depending on the state, occasionally non-residents) can carry firearms concealed in public and not have to obtain a permit first.
Naturally, this scares some people. So, with seven states currently having been permitless long enough for analysis, it’s worth seeing if the fear is warranted.
Main Take-Aways
- Compared to states that made no changes in concealed carry laws, there was no change in homicide rates.
- When we remove one outlier state, there is a drop in homicides in the permitless states compared to states that made no change.
- When we eliminate a sparsely populated frontier state, most trends are flat or downward.
Comparing Apples and Pineapples
Our objective is to see if states switching to permitless carry have a noticeable change in the homicide rates.
- We use overall homicide rates, instead of gun homicide rates, since public carry is intended, in part, to prevent public homicides of any means (e.g., a knife attack)
- We compare each permitless state against all other states that had no change in the permitting system for the preceding and succeeding five years.
This may sound like the picking of nits, but as this chart shows, the public carry mix is constantly churning. As such, a newly minted permitless state might be compared to a different number of “shall issue” and “may issue” states, than the next state that adopted permitess carry.
For newcomers, this is the breakdown of public carry types:
MAY ISSUE: You can get a public carry permit if the police let you, but it is up to them.
SHALL ISSUE: If you don’t have a criminal record, they must issue you a permit (some states have prerequisites, such as safety training, but there is no veto power held by the constabulary).
PERMITLESS: You can publicly carry if you have no criminal record, and you don’t need to get a permit first.
NO ISSUE: Doesn’t exist anymore, but refers to when a state government simply disallowed public carry to everyone.
Our evaluation looked at the annual difference in the homicide rates for each permitless state against the average homicide rates of states that had no change in their permitting legislation. The operational theory is that the difference over time would indicate if the permitless law was a net positive or negative compared to not changing anything.
The 1st Cut Results
It was neither a net positive nor negative. It was a null.
The slope of the line for states adopting permitless carry was identical for five years before and after the switch to permitless… down to two decimal places. Homicide rates (measured in murders per 100,000 population) were increasing at a slope line of 0.07 before and 0.07 after enactment.
But there was an odd uptick at the end of the five-year spans, caused by one state, Alaska. You will note that Alaska’s annual homicide rate leaps up and down. This erratic fluctuation is due to Alaska having the lowest population density of all states, and thus any small change in their total number of homicides produces a large change in their homicide rate.
Keep in mind, though, that with Alaska in the mix, the aggregate before-and-after homicide differential rate was dead even. Let’s treat Alaska as a very odd outlier and take them out of the equation.
When we do that, the pre-permitless homicide difference with states that didn’t change is 0.06 before the switch, and after it is -0.02, a net murder reduction. Notice that the average of all the differences (the fat, red line) is basically flat and would have been flatter still had it not been for single year rise in Arizona and Kansas in their fourth year of permitless carry.
In Danger of Boredom
It appears that permitless carry makes no meaningful difference in aggregate, though the diving lines for Mississippi and Missouri are of interest. There have been periods of unrest in Missouri, and with them switching to permitless a mere four years ago, we may be seeing the effects of broader social change there. But Mississippi is a head scratcher. They switched just one year before Missouri but have a great and downward rate of change. Perhaps global warming has made it too hot in Mississippi for anyone to have the energy to murder anyone else.
Many thanks to Gun Facts volunteer Chris C. for the laborious task of scraping together the crime data.
” which means residents (and, depending on the state, occasionally non-residents) ”
Read the Constitution ….Article IV, Section 2, “The Citizens of each State shall be entitled to ALL Privileges and Immunities of Citizens in the several States”
Not quite the case. The privileges and immunities clause tends to track with permits and adjudications.
For example, a medical license in Florida is not valid in Oregon. But a divorce decree in California is valid everywhere.
Until such time as the Supremes declare public carry as fundamental right, extending state-level permissions to non-residents is optional. I forget the name of the organization, but they coordinate which laws/permits/etc are valid across state lines, such as drivers’ licenses.
Point your browser at handgunlaw dot us for information about the states and reciprocity.
I am totally second amendment supporter I have carried now for probably 15 16 years in two different states. I have a concealed carry license. I’m not a advocate of permitless Carry, in my opinion getting a license to carry shows responsibility shows you’ve made a commitment to do things safely responsibly and protect yourself and others I think a permitless Carriers just do it out of a whim whereas a license person you’re making a commitment.