School Shootings Stats
“We don’t live in more violent times. We live in more televised times.” – Marilyn Manson
He is right and wrong, and one influences another. And such influences affect what happens in schools. A really long-term study has some clues.
- Television bent the curve on the frequency of mass school shootings around 1966.
- Average death rates in school shootings has doubled since 1966.
- High school males are the top problem spot.
175 years of “data”
A recent (2017) academic paper 1 sought to dig into school shootings going all the way back to 1840. Audacious, but we have to accept that mining data before the advent of modern national media is a bit risky. A school shooting might have only made county news in 1899, but it’s national news today.
Before wee dive in, we’ll note that the definition used in this paper was broad. Specifically, “An event is included in the data set as long as a firearm was discharged in an educational institution or on its grounds, regardless of the number of people wounded or killed, with a few exceptions.” Hence, this includes accidental discharges by people permitted to carry on campus, but also events like Sandy Hook.
That aside, we’ll accept that this work is at least informative, and especially so for a key moment in history that may have changed everything.
In 1966, 93% of American households had a television and America had its first nationally covered mass shooting, which occurred on a college campus – a “school shooting.”
That event was the University of Texas tower massacre, notable at the time for the perp shooting random, innocent people walking on campus (and also notable for the under-reporting about how citizens got rifles out of their trucks and provided “suppressive fire” to stop the perp from being effective).
Television is the reason this mass shooting is important. With 93% of homes watching, it changed public perceptions and gave future perps the notion that mass murder was “notable” (something the Columbine perps thrived on 33 years later).
Before this event, there were three documented mass school shootings (average 0.02 a year, from 1840). Afterwards there have been 17 (average 0.35 per year). As we have noted elsewhere, media enables future perps to better plan their attacks; and the better planned the attack, the higher the body count. This is part of the reason why the average number of people killed in a mass school shooting has doubled since 1966.
In terms of all school shootings (not just mass murders), high schools are the hot spot, which makes sense. High school males often have little self-restraint, whereas college students – due to cultures that promote higher education and have the means to acquire it – filter out people who lack restraint.
But from a public policy standpoint, this gets into some uncomfortable data. Since high school students (for sake of illustration, under age 18) are prohibited from buying rifles (aside from one state), let alone handguns, high school shooters are either (a) obtaining guns illegally or (b) were gifted a gun by an adult. For mass shootings (something the Gun Facts project maintains a database for) guns for K12 shootings are primarily acquired illegally.
All that said, students are not always the issue. Yes, they make up 65% of the perpetrators of school shootings, but adults on campus make up 26% of the incidents, and most of them appear not to be associated with the school. The authors didn’t break this down by K12 and universities, so we suspect the lion’s share of that 19% of adults who appear unconnected to the school were likely college instances since on-campus parties attract off-campus miscreants.
As important as “who” is “why.” What would make a person bring guns onto any campus (ignoring licensed carriers) and discharge a weapon? Most of the reasons are predictable, and one is surprising.
Interestingly, a full 8% of “school shootings” (remember the author’s broad definition) were accidents. Without their dataset, it is impossible to get a perp and campus breakdown, but it would not be unreasonable to assume that a few inner-city street gang members had accidental discharges while being school thugs.
After that, we get back to testosterone-soaked young males and their generally irresponsible behaviors. “Getting into fights at school” is an age-old trope based in reality. Young males have yet to fully learn restraint. If they have access to a gun, they might react to their angry disagreements with other students using something much worse that a left hook.
Gun-Free Schools, My Arse
Which brings up two touchy subjects: laws and responsibility.
As with street gangs, people who want to do harm find a way. Laws prohibiting felons in possession, strawman purchases, and murder have done nada in controlling inner-city mayhem.
Gun-free school laws had no effect either. Well intended, they ignored the fundamental problem with murderers, namely that they don’t care… about people, about human life, about laws.
They certainly don’t care about “gun-free schools.”
Given that laws don’t stop bad behavior, the other angle to explore is how children get guns (college adults, who can legally acquire a gun at retail, are a different set of issues). We noted that children most often obtain guns used in school shootings illegally. The two likely sources are from “street sources,” which make up 43% of crime guns 2 or from family (likely stolen).
It is incumbent upon adults to control access to their guns. One Gun Facts researcher speaks of when he was a kid, and that he knew (a) where his father kept guns and (b) that he wouldn’t wake up until next Thursday if he ever touched them. That is one form of access control. So are gun safes, trigger locks and when necessary, getting them out of the house.
We don’t have definitive numbers about kids swiping guns from parents and taking them to school. But we know of instances of mass public shootings at K12 schools where the perp swiped the guns from family members (i.e., Sandy Hook, Red Lake, Maryville, Santa Fe, etc.). In these cases there was “insufficient” access control, and it led to kids being murdered.
That said, tracking surveys say that 43% of households have one or more guns. There are about 49 million households with kids under 18 years of age. That would roughly equate to 21,000,000 households that have kids and guns, which indicates that most kids are not murderers, most parents secure their guns, or both.
I don’t understand what kind of a school is denoted by “School House.”
In the paper, they denote that it is the archaic description of any primary education building.
In the 1980s and early 1900s, many counties still had one-room or on-building schools, and they were routinely called “school houses”.
Every firearms owner must be aware that owning a firearm comes with a great deal of responsibility. Knowing the four cardinal rules of shooting is but one of them. Securing your firearms so that those who should not be able to get to them are stymied, whether in a gun safe, with firearms locks, or otherwise rendering the firearm unshootable is equally as important. Hiding your firearm is not on that list simply because it quite simply doesn’t work. Children are particularly inquisitive and amazingly adept at finding things adults consider to be well-hidden. The threat of dire consequences for touching a carelessly available firearm is great, but far from fool-proof. Lock ’em up so that you don’t get locked up.
My father raised a whole tribe of kids, he was a gun lover and owned more than what would be thought of as just the norm. He had dozens of guns. They were never locked up, he had them everywhere. We were educated at what most might consider too young of an age( around 3-4) depending on each kid and how they mentally matured, he had a simple manner of giving you a life long memory of how much damage a gun could cause. He would simply hand use a rifle that was way too big, too heavy, and have us fire it off as we looked down the sight aiming (with much much struggle) down the barrel. When we pulled the trigger it would of course kick back and up, both of which would cause injury to us since we were so small. As you basically picked yourself up off the ground, with you face swelling,and possibly bleeding some, your shoulder in pain and you crying loudly. Then he would say to you, never forget that every bit of pain you feel now came from the end of the gun that doesn’t really cause the person any pain. That you must remember the pain come out of the other end and all you feel now, it’s nothing when compared to what then bullet coming out the other end causes. Guns are not toys, not ever for play, and if you ever point one at someone your life better be in danger because that action if taken will kill they other person. He always said there’s no such thing as an empty gun and forgetting that will likely result in the end of your life or that of someone else. It was something every single one of us and many kids that were just our friends never forgot. That was just his first lesson on guns, he had many many more. No one ever played around with them. He hated bb guns, he felt they taught kids to disrespect guns and was the true cause for so many Accidental shootings as people got older, that they didn’t see the seriousness of what the gun was capable of. I agree 100%. Some may not agree with the tactics My dad used and to them I say this his tactics were 100% effective for more kids than I can ever say because another of the ones he trained, trained others in same manner and there has NEVER been any problems from anyone ever experiencing that form of education. So what your opinion on the matter may be means nothing to those of us growing up loving guns and respecting them at same time. More kids should be trained in same manner. Let it hurt them first, then show them the joy they can bring and security they provide while not making it an easy thing for you to pull the trigger on someone else. Because you know the pin is tremendous.